
Full Paper Submission Summary
Please find here the current summary of Abstract submissions ID numbers with a total count, which MS or SS the submitter has requested to be aligned to and their paper status.
As an MS/SS proposer, you have been set up to conduct full paper reviews.
You are able to review full papers within your MS/SS via the link below. Search via abstract ID in the search button, should you wish to review any papers that have requested to be included in your MS/SS proposal.
Full Papers are now available to you and reviewing closes Wednesday 15 February 2025, so authors can be advised by Monday, 17 February (as published on the website).
If any editing of the paper content is required, authors will have until Monday, 24 February 2025 to resubmit.
We ask that you complete a minimum of five (5) full paper reviews. Paper Reviews are not setup for blind reviewing which means you will be able to see authors details. Once each paper has been reviewed twice, it will no longer be available for review.
If you have not reviewed abstracts or full papers using the Currinda software before:
Simply access your online profile here: https://members.asnevents.com.au/register/event/1926
Login using the email address this message has been sent to and enter your password. If you do not remember your password, please use the forgot password function
After logging in, select the ‘Reviews’ tab in the centre of your profile
From there please select the ‘Paper Review’ button and proceed to the first full paper
You can make notes for each paper and search (using search function on review platform) for ones you wish to review. If there is a paper which is a conflict of interest for you, please select the ‘Abstain/Conflict of Interest’ button. We recognise that you may have potential conflicts of interest with multiple papers and encourage you to use your own judgement regarding these.
Criteria for acceptance of a paper are:
The topic of the paper is broadly within the themes of the IALCCE 2025, if not please add your recommendation
The contents of the paper are technically reasonable
- methodology is reasonable
- text logically flows
- results are reasonableThe language in the paper demonstrates sufficient comprehension of English
Format complies with publisher guidelines (see “link” here if not clear)
The paper is not related to a commercial advertisement
Should you encounter any issues when reviewing, please feel free to contact us. We appreciate your contribution to full paper reviewing for IALCCE2025.
We look forward for your speedy review of the papers you selected.